<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BricaBox Manifesto: Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bricabox.com/thread/70/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bricabox.com/thread/70</link>
	<description>Threads of Social Knitting</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nate Westheimer</title>
		<link>http://blog.bricabox.com/thread/70#comment-5494</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Westheimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bricabox.com/thread/70#comment-5494</guid>
		<description>That's a great comment, Bud. One of the ways we'll approach this issue is by opening an API in the future. This will allow us to focus on popularly used and needed features, and leave the niche work to interested developers. While it seems we're trying to be all things to all people, we really do have something to offer pretty much ever level of user. I'll work on showing that in a graph of some sort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great comment, Bud. One of the ways we&#8217;ll approach this issue is by opening an API in the future. This will allow us to focus on popularly used and needed features, and leave the niche work to interested developers. While it seems we&#8217;re trying to be all things to all people, we really do have something to offer pretty much ever level of user. I&#8217;ll work on showing that in a graph of some sort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bud Caddell</title>
		<link>http://blog.bricabox.com/thread/70#comment-5489</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud Caddell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bricabox.com/thread/70#comment-5489</guid>
		<description>Nate, excellent post and I'm definitely excited to see the full bricabox platform.

Feature scope is definitely a tough call. Look at Basecamp -- Jason says they purposefully leave higher-end functionality out of the program and would gladly point people up the food chain. They believe they serve a very specific niche of users. Is Bricabox of that mind-set? If so, I'd like to see that top diagram with user groups or levels, in terms of difficulty and knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate, excellent post and I&#8217;m definitely excited to see the full bricabox platform.</p>
<p>Feature scope is definitely a tough call. Look at Basecamp &#8212; Jason says they purposefully leave higher-end functionality out of the program and would gladly point people up the food chain. They believe they serve a very specific niche of users. Is Bricabox of that mind-set? If so, I&#8217;d like to see that top diagram with user groups or levels, in terms of difficulty and knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
